Os Ho-ho-límpicos

Series1977

Os Ho-ho-límpicos (Laff-A-Lympics no original em inglês) é um desenho com produção Hanna-Barbera. Passava junto com os desenhos do Scooby-Doo. Mostrava a história de vários personagens Hanna-Barbera, divididos em três times, que competiam em vários esportes, ao redor do mundo. E todo episódio saía uma medalha de ouro, uma de prata e uma de bronze. Foi criado seguindo os parâmetros da Olimpíada. Estreou em 1977 e teve duas temporadas, com 24 episódios.

Where to watch

We couldn't find where to watch this in Brazil right now.

Search on JustWatch

Valor ScoreModerate+22

Filtro ScoreExceptional85

Content AdvisoryMild3

Cultural reading (editorial opinion)

Woke Score

Clean0

Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.

Frequently asked questions

Is "Os Ho-ho-límpicos" appropriate for children?

Filtro Digital's Content Advisory for "Os Ho-ho-límpicos" is "Mild" (3/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. One example of the evidence behind this reading: the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.

See the per-axis breakdown

Does "Os Ho-ho-límpicos" have woke/ideological content?

In Filtro Digital's editorial reading, "Os Ho-ho-límpicos" has ideological presence rated "Clean". This is opinion backed by evidence, not a verdict: one cited example is the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. The overall FiltroScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 85/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.

See the per-axis breakdown

Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.

AI reference — unverifiedA obra apresenta situações de violência de caráter estritamente cartunesco (estilo pastelão), tais como quedas cômicas, colisões e explosões causadas por trapaças esportivas, nas quais não são exibidos ferimentos detalhados, sangue ou dor realista, e os personagens se recuperam instantaneamente.

Ideological reading (editorial opinion)

This is Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.

Anti-Family0.0
AI Analysis · Model: IA
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
Faith Subversion0.0
AI Analysis · Model: IA

Your review

Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.

Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.

Ideological(4)

Identity PoliticsFraming that reduces characters to identity-group grievances or activism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 incidental framing · 7 a recurring lens · 10 the work’s core message
Historical RevisionismRewriting historical facts or figures to fit a contemporary agenda.Severity0Reference scale: 0 accurate · 3 a minor liberty · 7 clearly reshaped facts · 10 history rewritten wholesale
Faith SubversionMocking, distorting, or undermining religious faith and the sacred.Severity0Reference scale: 0 respectful · 3 a passing jab · 7 sustained mockery · 10 the sacred systematically degraded
Anti-FamilyPortraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a stray remark · 7 a recurring theme · 10 the family portrayed as the enemy

Content(4)

Inappropriate SexualizationSexual content that is gratuitous or targets minors/underage characters.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 a suggestive moment · 7 recurring explicit content · 10 pervasive/exploitative content
Graphic ViolenceExplicit, dwelling, or glorified depictions of violence and gore.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 brief or implied violence · 7 explicit violence with gore · 10 prolonged, glorified brutality
ProfanityFrequency and intensity of coarse language, slurs, and blasphemy.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none · 3 occasional mild language · 7 frequent strong language · 10 constant slurs or blasphemy
Drug GlamorizationPresenting drug or substance abuse as cool, harmless, or aspirational.Severity0Reference scale: 0 none or shown negatively · 3 incidental use, not glamorized · 7 use shown as cool/harmless · 10 drug use central and aspirational

Values(6)

Pro-FamilyHonoring marriage, parenthood, and loyalty between generations.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 incidental warmth · 7 a clear pro-family thread · 10 family bonds are the work’s central triumph
Faith & TranscendenceSincere treatment of faith, the sacred, and transcendent meaning.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or mocking · 3 a passing sincere moment · 7 sustained sincere treatment · 10 transcendence is the work’s central theme
Virtue & HeroismCourage, sacrifice, honesty, and genuine moral heroism.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or subverted · 3 a minor heroic gesture · 7 a clear heroic arc · 10 sacrificial heroism drives the whole story
Patriotism / WesternAppreciation for nation, heritage, and the Western civilizational tradition.Severity0Reference scale: 0 absent or hostile · 3 a passing nod · 7 clear appreciation of heritage · 10 defense of Western civilization is central
Artistic IntegrityCraft, coherence, and honest artistic intent over cynical formula.Severity0Reference scale: 0 cynical or formulaic · 3 competent but generic · 7 clear craft and honest intent · 10 exceptional, uncompromising vision
Artistic MeritOverall aesthetic quality: writing, direction, performance, and craft.Severity0Reference scale: 0 poor craft throughout · 3 uneven but watchable · 7 well-crafted across the board · 10 masterful writing, direction and performance

Review titleReviewContains spoiler