천국의 계단
Where to watch
Sponsored links — Filtro may earn a commission. This does not influence the scores.
Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.
Frequently asked questions
Is "천국의 계단" appropriate for children?
Filtro Digital's Content Advisory for "천국의 계단" is "Mild" (10/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. One example of the evidence behind this reading: the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "천국의 계단" have woke/ideological content?
In Filtro Digital's editorial reading, "천국의 계단" has ideological presence rated "Moderate". This is opinion backed by evidence, not a verdict: one cited example is the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. The overall FiltroScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 69/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- AI reference — unverifiedA madrasta Tae Mi-ra abusa constantemente de Han Jung-suh, trancando-a em um quarto escuro e agredindo-a fisicamente para beneficiar sua filha biológica Han Yu-ri.
- AI reference — unverifiedA obra retrata um atropelamento automobilístico sofrido pela personagem principal e agressões físicas como tapas no rosto, sem exibição detalhada de sangue, mutilações ou ferimentos graves.
- AI reference — unverifiedA obra apresenta cenas de romance e drama familiar com demonstrações de afeto limitadas a abraços e beijos entre os protagonistas, sem a exibição de nudez ou conteúdo sexual explícito.
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family4.0AI Analysis · Model: IA
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
View evidence (1)
Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- AI reference — unverified
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.