이판사판
Where to watch
Sponsored links — Filtro may earn a commission. This does not influence the scores.
Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.
Frequently asked questions
Is "이판사판" appropriate for children?
Filtro Digital's Content Advisory for "이판사판" is "Moderate" (18/100), measuring sex, violence, language, and drug use. One example of the evidence behind this reading: the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. See the full per-axis breakdown below to decide if it fits your family.
See the per-axis breakdownDoes "이판사판" have woke/ideological content?
In Filtro Digital's editorial reading, "이판사판" has ideological presence rated "Clean". This is opinion backed by evidence, not a verdict: one cited example is the editorial analysis has not yet recorded a specific citation for this axis. The overall FiltroScore (cleanliness + value + audience rating) is 91/100. See every axis and its evidence in the breakdown below.
See the per-axis breakdownScores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- AI reference — unverifiedA obra apresenta cenas de violência contida, como um episódio em que um réu faz uma refém no tribunal sob ameaça física com um objeto cortante, e a morte por estrangulamento de um prisioneiro em sua cela, retratadas de forma breve e sem exibição de sangue ou detalhes anatômicos explícitos.
- AI reference — unverifiedA protagonista, juíza Lee Jung-joo, perde o controle no tribunal e profere xingamentos e palavras de baixo calão contra um réu insolente, demonstrando um comportamento explosivo recorrente nos episódios iniciais.
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family0.0AI Analysis · Model: IA
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
- Faith Subversion0.0AI Analysis · Model: IA
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.