A Entrevista
Dave Skylark e seu produtor Aaron Rapoport têm um programa de TV apelativo sobre celebridades chamado "Skylark Tonight". Eles descobrem que o ditador norte-coreano Kim Jong-un é fã do programa e decidem fazer uma entrevista com ele, na tentativa de legitimarem-se como jornalistas. Enquanto Dave e Aaron se preparam para viajar para Pyongyang, eles têm seus planos mudados pela CIA, que os recruta para assassinar Kim Jong-un.
Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is “woke”.
Woke Score: 0 = no alerts, 100 = maximum presence (higher = more woke). Valor: 0 = low, +100 = exceptional. These are opinions with evidence, not factual verdicts.
Woke Score runs 0 to 100 (higher = more woke / stronger ideological alert). Valor Score ranges 0 to +100 (higher = more value-aligned). Both are opinions with evidence, not measurements.
Confidence shows how much evidence backs the score. AI-only means an automatic first read; community-validated means several people have rated it; verified means a human reviewer checked it.
Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
- AI reference — unverifiedDave Skylark attends a wild, neon-lit party in Pyongyang with Kim Jong-un where they drink alcohol and consume drugs in a glamorized, high-energy party atmosphere.
- AI reference — unverifiedKim Jong-un's helicopter is shot down by a tank shell, showing his face and head catching fire and exploding in slow motion. Additionally, Aaron has his fingers bitten off by a guard during a struggle.
- AI reference — unverifiedAaron is forced to hide a container containing a chemical agent inside his rectum, leading to multiple crude conversations and physical comedy regarding the situation.
- AI reference — unverifiedCharacters throughout the film frequently use strong vulgarity and profanity, particularly the word 'fuck' and its derivatives in common conversation.
Ideological reading (editorial opinion)
This is Filtro Digital’s editorial reading + community reactions — not a claim that the work objectively is X% woke.
- Anti-Family1.0AI Analysis · Model: gemini-agy
What does each axis mean?
Portraying the natural family or parenthood as oppressive or obsolete.
View evidence
Scores reflect community and AI analysis as opinion with evidence — not a factual verdict.
Nothing here yet.
- Faith Subversion1.0
Your review
Rate only what you actually noticed — leave the rest at zero.
Attach a link or quote to back up your rating — especially for high severity.